Questions for Barack Obama

On the 27th, two days after the President’s State of the Union address, Barrack Obama will address questions from internet users live on Youtube as part of “Your Interview With The President,” which is powered by Google Moderator. I think Google’s support for this is idea is excellent, as it allows a venue for everyday citizen’s to share their concerns with the rest of society and to hopefully be addressed by the President.

Youtube user’s have until 12:00am Eastern Time to submit and vote on their video or text questions. The most popular questions, based on popular vote, will likely be presented to the President tomorrow.

While the initiative seems to focus on healthcare, foreign policy, and education, many popular questions are related to other topics, such as legalizing marijuana and ending the war on drugs, balancing the budget and bringing our troops home from the middle east.

Here is my video question:

Other questions I’ve submitted:

The US government has apparently taken on the burden of policing the world by spending billions of dollars establishing military bases throughout the globe. Do you believe it it is our duty to police the world? If so, why do you believe this?

If an individual or business were to act like the federal government with finances an debt, they’d be bankrupt or shut down. Why do we not make balancing the budget and paying off the national debt a priority?

One of the most popular questions by a former police officer calls for the end of the drug prohibition and has captured nearly 11,500. Apparently, last time Mr. Obama answered user-submitted questions, he ignored the question related to marijuana decriminalization/legalization. Perhaps that will not be the case this time around.

Check out the official WorldView channel Youtube Channel for more on this initiative.

Will Illinois Join the Ranks of Medical Marijuana States?

With fifteen states already having some form of medical marijuana law, and several new states drafting similar laws, it’s no surprise that Illinois has joined the ranks of those trying to pass such laws through state legislatures, despite being notorious for marijuana arrests, which are the sixth highest in the country.

A bill narrowly passed the Senate on May 27th, 2009 in Illinois. The bill’s status can be viewed here, and the actual text of the bill here. It subsequently cleared the House subcommittee, came up for a vote in the State House, but was not passed or denied. It will likely be revoted upon early next year. Currently, the Illinois General Assembly lists the bills status as “Placed on Calendar – Consideration Postponed.”  The bill will be repealed three year after going into law unless it is reapproved. If passed, the bill will go in law on July 1st, 2011.

Who will be able to use medical marijuana? It appears that Illinois will be much more restrictive than some states that have embraced medical cannabis, namely California, where almost anyone can get a cannabis registry card. Some say cannabis can and should be a medical treatment from severe to moderate conditions, including things such as depression and insomnia. Illinois will restrict medical marijuana to a much narrower group of patients.

Senate Bill 1381, also dubbed the Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act, allow “physicians” to recommend medical marijuana to qualified patients, namely those suffering from “debilitating conditions,” permitting them to possess up to two ounces of cannabis and up to seven plants, only three of which may be mature or flowering. The Public Health Department would issue registry cards for caregivers and their patients. Plants must be grown in a secure facility, and cannabis would not be allowed to be smoked in public or on school property.

They define debilitating medical condition as one of the following: cancer, glaucoma, HIV positive, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, hepatitis C, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Crohn’s disease, agitation of Alzheimer’s disease, nail patella, or “the treatment of these conditions.” The bill then goes on to define various symptoms or side effects that can result in a cannabis “prescription.” Among these are seizures, severe muscle spasms, intractable pain, severe debilitating nausea, or other medical conditions or treatments approved by the Department of Public Health.

In sort, the Act has the following restrictions:

“Provides that the Act does not: (i) allow the use of cannabis if that person does not have a serious or debilitating medical condition; (ii) allow any person who is not allowed to use cannabis under the Act to use cannabis that a cardholder is allowed to possess pursuant to the Act, (iii) transfer cannabis to any person who is not allowed to possess cannabis under the Act.”

Medical marijuana supporters from the Marijuana Policy Project have begun airing radio ads in Chicago, Peoria, the Quad Cities, and Rockford asking citizens to support this initiative. You can hear the ad here. According to a recent poll, 68% of the state supports legalization for medical use, while it is estimated that less than half support complete legalization. The MPP provides an easy way to contact your representative and let them know where you stand. If you support this pill, please do so.

I support the passage of the medical bill, but when will we set our sites higher? I don’t think a patient should be prosecuted for using marijuana as a medicine. But I find it equally appalling for someone to be arrested for recreational use. What right does a government, any government, or any entity have to tell someone else what they can or cannot put in their body? The notion is primitive, immoral, and absurd. I do think that the national medical marijuana movement, as well as some decriminalization we’ve seen, is a movement in the right direction. To those of you who no longer buy into governmental propaganda and unfounded social stigma, thank you. You give me hope that a free society is possible.

Again, if you live in Illinois, please contact your state Representative and let them know that you support this bill. Tell them you think they should vote yes. Calling is preferred, but even an email helps.

Judge Shares His Thoughts on Ending the Drug War

Though not a new video, I just found this jem:

-

Judge Jim Gray shares his thoughts with Reason on ending the war on drugs. In the video above, he highlights those who benefit through profit from the war on drugs: drug lords, gang leaders, law enforcement, politicians, private prison businesses, terrorists. He even goes so far to call drug prohibition the “golden goose” of terrorism!

These groups are all benefiting from the drug prohibition, so why should they support ending the war, or even take an objective cost-benefit analysis? They won’t, because it’s just bad business.

“People who that are supporting the status quo are on the wrong side of history… its just a question of when. And then I guarantee anyone who will listen, that two years after we change away from this failed and hopeless policy, everyone will join arms and look back astonished, aghast that we could have perpetuated such a failed system for so long. The best thing I can do for my country is to help us repeal drug prohibition. It’s the most patriotic thing I can do, and we are going to be successful.”

I absolutely agree with this man.

DEA Ban on “Synthetic Marijuana” Will Endanger Consumers, Not End “Legal Highs”

“Synthetic marijuana” brands like Spice, K2, and other herbal blends are sold in headshops across the country as incense. Headshops can get away with selling these products because, as incense, they’re not intended for human consumption. The chemicals on many of these legal high blends will soon become Schedule 1, due to a  DEA emergency ban that makes the chemicals illegal within thirty days. The chemicals named are JWH-018, JWH-200, CP-47,497, JWH-073, and cannabicyclohexanol. This temporary emergency ban will make these five chemicals illegal for at least a year while they are further studied. Of course, one can say with reasonable certainty that once these studies are concluded, these chemicals will remain scheduled. The ban goes into effect thirty days after the DEA announcement, leaving users several weeks to purchase remaining inventory.

Several states have already banned some of these chemicals, but this new ban is a federal ban. One of the reasons given for the ban is that these blends have send several users to the hospital, typically for some sort of panic attack. However, these reports are the minority.

Since these chemicals are fairly new to human use, it is reasonable to say that we don’t know much about their health profile or any long-term effects. However, we should recognize that the only reason people turn to these legal blends is because they are seeking the marijuana-like high. If cannabis was legal, there would be nearly no demand for these chemicals like JWH-018, which have little history of human use. Why would someone cho0se to smoke a herbal blend, made with a potentially-dangerous chemical that has little known about it, in order to get a cannabis like high? They wouldn’t. Cannabis would be a much safer alternative to these so-called “legal highs.”

The drug war has failed, and more and more people are waking up to this. This is especially true in relation to the marijuana prohibition, as can be seen by the enormous increase in calls for legalization across the country.

The recent ban is a bad thing for many reasons, but primarily because once these five chemicals will be banned, creators of legal highs will continue to be innovative. There are potentially hundreds of related chemicals that are cannabinoids, including a score of JWH alternatives, some even more potent. There are likely many potential cannabinoids that haven’t even been synthesized yet. While some of these may be covered under the Analog Act, it is likely many of them may not. This means that legal, marijuana-like blends will not go away – they will simply become more dangerous to the consumer.

The recent DEA ban will primarily do two things: cause users of JWH to return to marijuana (which is safer, albeit illegal), and cause designer drug groups to create new, legal cannabinoid blends that will have similar or near-identical effects. The problem with this should be obvious; these new drugs will hit the market, but they even less history of human consumption or testing than the chemical the DEA just banned. By banning a drug with a history of human use, the DEA is essentially forcing people to turn to riskier, less-known alternatives; banning these alternatives will make users turn to even more potentially dangerous alternatives!

Even if the DEA banned every drug known to man, there would still be a demand for these drugs. If there’s a demand, the market will provide them, even if at a higher price or more risk to the consumer. It’s time for the DEA to change it’s strategy; rather than ban and prohibit drugs, the U.S. government should begin to look at drug use/abuse as a health issue, rather than a crime. After all, there is no victim.

I predict that the companies that currently sell the legal highs with the banned chemicals will not vanish entirely; rather, they will adapt. These companies are doing nothing wrong and technically nothing illegal; they are merely providing a product and service for which there is a great demand in America. Is that so monstrous? The Drug Enforcement Agency is the real criminal here. By perpetuating the marijuana prohibition, which is completely illogical, immoral, and maybe even unconstitutional, they help endanger the citizens our government is supposed to protect.

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Facebook